Comments About Global Warming
By John Colemanjcoleman@kusi.com
It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming. It is a SCAM.
Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990’s to create an illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the “research” to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.
Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization-threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.
Now their ridiculess, manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental-conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy, with one 15 minute documentary segment.
I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party.
However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you “believe in.” It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won’t believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.
I suspect you might like to say to me, “John, the research that supports the case for global warming was done by research scientists; people with PhD’s in Meteorology. They are employed by major universities and important research institutions. Their work has been reviewed by other scientists with PhD’s. They have to know a lot more about it than you do. Come on, John, get with it. The experts say our pollution has created a strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a rapid, out of control, global warming is underway that will skyrocket temperatures, destroy agriculture, melt the ice caps, flood the coastlines and end life as we know it. How can you dissent from this crisis? You must be a bit nutty.”
Allow me, please, to explain how I think this all came about. Our universities have become somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There is a culture, and attitudes and values and pressures on campus that are very different. I know this group well. My father and my older brother were both PhD-University types. I was raised in the university culture. Any person who spends a decade at a university obtaining a PhD in Meteorology and becomes a research scientist, more likely than not, becomes a part of that single minded culture. They all look askance at the rest of us, certain of their superiority. They respect government and disrespect business, particularly big business. They are environmentalists above all else.
And, there is something else. These scientists know that if they do research and results are in no way alarming, their research will gather dust on the shelf and their research careers will languish. But if they do research that sounds alarms, they will become well known and respected and receive scholarly awards and, very importantly, more research dollars will come flooding their way.
So when these researchers did climate change studies in the late 90’s they were eager to produce findings that would be important and be widely noticed and trigger more research funding. It was easy for them to manipulate the data to come up with the results they wanted to make headlines and at the same time drive their environmental agendas. Then their like-minded PhD colleagues reviewed their work and hastened to endorse it without question.
There were a few who didn’t fit the mold. They did ask questions and raised objections. They did research with contradictory results. The environmental elitists berated them, brushing their studies aside.
I have learned since the Ice-Age-is-coming scare in the 1970’s to always be a skeptic about research. In the case of global warming, I didn’t accept media accounts. Instead I read dozens of the scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct when I assure you there is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It is all a scam, the result of bad science.
I am not alone in this assessment. There are hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them PhD’s, who are as certain as I am that this global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.
I am incensed by the incredible media glamor, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming. (ED: Al Gore) In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the temperature-rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm patterns all fail to occur as predicted, everyone will come to realize we have been duped.
The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway. I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.
Published with John Coleman’s permission. John Coleman works at KUSI NEWS Weather in San Diego and is the founder of the Weather Channel.
9 comments
Great! Thank you. We need to get the word out to combat the idiocy that is currently extant.
[...] Comments About Global Warming By maggie Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990’s to create an illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped … The Climate Scam - http://www.theclimatescam.com [...]
Apparently some people have not yet noticed that the temperature stopped significant increase in 1998. If it wasn’t for that 22 year period from 1976 to 1998 when the atmospheric carbon dioxide level and average global temperature happened to increase at the same time, the term ‘greenhouse gas’ would be virtually unknown and Kyoto and the rest of the Global Warming Mistake would never have happened. As the atmospheric carbon dioxide continues to increase and average earth temperature doesn’t, many people are going to look more and more foolish, the faulty predictions of the incomplete GCMs will continue to be exposed, and the main-stream media’s global warming hype will cease. Anyone that would like to see graphs constructed using government data of actual climate history should look at http://www.middlebury.net:80/op-ed/pangburn.html .
Smart work on global warming issue……….. I really appreciate your efforts…. amazing………………… and I will try to read you blog frequently………
Scientists in the U.K. have reported evidence that further refutes one theory of global climate change.
In the heated debate over global warming, there is an opposing idea, called the cosmic ray theory, which contends that climate change is simply caused by cosmic rays coming from the sun.
Putting aside for a moment the fact that global warming is a creation of the UN and its subsidiary organs (UNEP, WMO, IPCC, etc.), those paragons of virtue and integrity (do Oil for Food, sexual abuse of refugee girls, Luud Rubbers, procurement fraud, to name just a few, ring any bells), if one fraud is enough to disqualify any organisation from retaining trust, respect and authority, where does that leave the UN?
And adding insult to injury, the Head of the WMO, Jarraud, is the same guy who benefited from the embezzlement of 3.5 million USD which was used to rig the election for Secretary General of the WMO in 2003, and who then fired the WMO internal auditor as she tried to follow the money trail and found that it was leading back to senior WMO management–the story was reported in the International Herald Tribune:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/01/26/news/UN-GEN-UN-Weather-Agency-Corruption.php
A group of 11 US Congressmen have called on the Congressional accountability ageny, GAO, to investigate the alleged fraud (http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/minority/news040407.htm ), and a Swiss criminal judge has opened an investigation into the alleged “vote-buying” that was committed with the WMO’s embezzled funds (and purportedly resulted in Jarraud’s initial election in 2003).
The auditor has filed a legal suit in US Federal District Court in NYC-her complaint (including civil racketeering charges) and her final investigative report can be found at http://www.unreform-now.org (click on Veiga v. WMO, Jarraud et al. on the left).
The ultimate question for all of us is why are we listening to such corrupt organisations as the UN, WMO (and its SG who was initially elected in a rigged election in 2003 using funds embezzled from WMO itself)??? What else are the UN, WMO and Jarraud lying about?!?!?! Global warming perhaps????
The Traces of the Climate Changing Galactic Vacuum Density Waves in the Solar System
Dr. Gerhard Löbert, Otterweg 48, 85598 Baldham, Germany. April 6, 2008.
Physicist. Recipient of The Needle of Honor of German Aeronautics.
1. Introduction
Seaon Theory, a new theory of gravitation based on quantum mechanics, not only covers the well-known Einstein-effects but also shows up half a dozen post-Einstein effects that occur in nature. From a humanitarian standpoint, the most important super-Einsteinian physical phenomenon is the generation of small-amplitude longitudinal gravitational waves by the motion of the supermassive bodies located at the center of our galaxy, their transmission throughout the Galaxy, and the action of these waves on the Sun, the Earth and the other celestial bodies through which they pass. These vacuum density waves, which carry with them small changes in the electromagnetic properties of the vacuum including the speed of light c, occur in an extremely large period range from minutes to millennia.
In a field of non-constant c, a particle of mass m experiences the electromagnetic gradient force mc² grad c / c. As a result, a free body will accelerate with c grad c in a field of non-constant c. In a vacuum density wave c is constant in planes normal to the propagation vector. Thus, a galactic vacuum density wave produces forces directed towards and away from the galactic center.
On the Sun, these vacuum density waves modulate the intensity of the thermonuclear energy conversion process within the core, which is extremely sensitive to the local vacuum electromagnetic properties, and this has its effect on all physical quantities of the Sun. (This is called solar activity).
On the Earth, the steady stream of vacuum density waves produces parts-per-billion changes in a large number of geophysical quantities. The most important quantities are the radius, circumference, rotational velocity, gravitational acceleration, VLBI baseline lengths, and axis orientation angles of the Earth, as well as the orbital elements of all low-earth-orbit satellites. The short-period and transient components of the waves trigger earthquakes due to the circumference changes in the decimeter range. All of these fluctuations have been measured.
Irrefutable evidence for the existence of this new, super-Einsteinian wave type is provided by the extremely close correlation between changes of the mean surface temperature and fluctuations of the mean rotational velocity of the Earth (see Fig. 2.2 of http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm). Einsteinian theory cannot explain this amazing correlation between two physical quantities that seem to be completely unrelated.
2. Climatological Traces
As is well known, the sunspots vary with an average period of 11.07 years (see T. Niroma in http://www.personal.inet.fi/tiede/tilmari/sunspot4.html) and the mean global surface temperature varied in a quasi-periodic manner with a mean period of 70 years in the past 150 years (see Fig. 2.1 of http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm). Based on all of the available sunspot cycle records, the Gleissberg solar cycle, which leads global temperature by about 6 years, has a mean length of 78.5 years (see T. Niroma). From the sunspot cycle and from the extremely close temperature-rotation-correlation it can be deduced that the stream of galactic vacuum density waves contains two dominant wave trains of 11.07 years and 78.5 years mean period.
3. Planet Orbital Periods
In my previous Note (Climate Change Cycles, Galactic Vacuum Density Waves, and the Orbital Periods of the Outer Planets of April 4, 2008) it was shown that the orbital period of Jupiter agrees to 7% with the mean sunspot cycle period, the orbital period of Uranus agrees to 7% with the mean Gleissberg period, and the orbital period of Saturn agrees to 13% with the amplitude modulation period that is obtained when the above two wave trains are combined. The orbital period of Neptune is 5% larger than 2 times the mean Gleissberg period and that of Pluto is 7% larger than 3 times Gleissberg.
Now to the remaining planets. The following table shows the ratio of the mean sunspot cycle period of 11.07 years to the planet orbital period.
Mars = 6 - 0.11 Earth = 11 + 0.07
Venus = 18 - 0.01 Mercury = 46 - 0.04
With an average error of 6% of an orbital period, the orbital periods are whole-number fractions of the mean sunspot cycle period.
As can be seen, the 11.07 years and 78.5 years galactic wave trains have brought good order into the Solar System. The degree of order increases with the number of orbital revolutions per million years.
4. The Orientation of the Ecliptic Relative to the Galactic Center
The forces exerted by the galactic waves are directed parallel to the propagation vector. Thus it can be expected that ultimately the plane of the ecliptic will be directed towards the galactic center. Actually, the galactic center lies about 5 deg. below the ecliptic.
5. The Tilt of the Rotational Axes of the Planets
With the exception of Mercury and Jupiter, all planets have a relatively large tilt of the rotational axis. Since the moment of the tidal forces acting on an oblate rotating planet is always directed normal to the rotation vector and parallel to the orbit plane, the tidal action of the Sun and the other planets cannot change the inclination angle of the planet. One therefore has to ask how these large tilt angles and the retrograde rotation of Uranus, Pluto, and Venus were brought about. The galactic vacuum density waves provide a possible answer. Since the tilting moment resulting from the tidal forces of the galactic wave is not directed parallel to the orbit plane of the planet, the inclination angle of the planet can change.slowly with time to any value.
6. Cataclysmic Vacuum Density Waves
Every few tens of millions of years the supermassive and superdense object situated at the center of the Galaxy explodes and sends a cataclysmic vacuum density wave through the Galaxy. When this wave hits the Earth, the rotational axis is forced into a new position, the radius and circumference are reduced drastically, the tectonic plates are forced against each other and rise and fall significantly, complete river systems change their beds, volcanos erupt, magma is ejected, and mass extinction of animal life occurs. The Grand Canyon vividly shows the sudden transitions between differing sediments and differing fossils that result from the passage of such a cataclysmic wave.
The large number of ring galaxies, for example NGC 1344 and the Cartwheel Galaxy A 0035 (see http://www.apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap010612.html), provide a vivid impression of the devastating action of such a cataclysmic vacuum density wave on the celestial bodies through which it passes.
You are absolutely correct about GW being a ’scam’. A telling point that can be easily understood by the general public is the earth’s temperature history since 1998. The fact that the earth’s temperature has not increased during this period of increasing atmospheric
CO2 should put to rest the correlation between GW and carbon ‘footprints’. The same may be said about the 40-year period 1940-1980.
I recently had a Global Warming debunking article published at World Net Daily. You folks might be interested in the approach.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=61969
Cheers,
Terry
Leave a Comment